Archive for Oregon Businesses

How Government Can Help Businesses

Tuesday, November 30th, 2010

Here it is the Holiday Season again, but too many Oregonians do not have much to celebrate. The official numbers indicate that just over 200,000 of our state residents are out of work. But the true number is much higher. Thousands of businesses owners have closed their doors over the last two years. Most of the owners are not included in the unemployment numbers. We have also had tens of thousands of students graduate from school, but they are also excluded from the official State Unemployment static’s.

In 2008 Oregonians passed Measures 66 and 67, which increased taxation on corporations. Even companies who sold a lot of product, but did not make a profit had to pay thousands more in State taxes. Some of these corporations moved out of the state, while adding their employees to the unemployment rolls.

Our government has added to their rolls to reduce the number of unemployed workers, but that costs all of us more money. You see, government workers are overhead expenses like buildings and equipment. The cost associated with their salary and benefits must come out of the state budget. They do not bring in any revenue, but simply shift from one category to another. Oh, they also cost us three to five times more money, but government is not about truth, it’s about packaging and presenting “good news.”

So how do we fix this dilemma? Call, write, e-mail your government representatives and tell them we need a smaller government with less regulations and redundant agencies. Employers will not hire more people unless they are sure those workers will make more profit for the company. It’s just that simple! Would like to work all week and not make any money? Neither do business owners. Government does not make our lives better. They have become a big fat burden, which needs to go on a diet.

Ken Bear Cole

A Second Look Business Consulting LLC

Categories : Oregon Businesses
Comments (0)

Allen Alley, Chris Dudley and John Lim to debate at Dorchester

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

Three of the Republicans seeking their party’s
nomination for governor in the May primary will
debate at the Dorchester Conference, an unofficial
gathering of Republicans.

The debate will follow the opening ceremony at 8 p.
m. Friday at the Seaside Convention Center.

Allen Alley, Chris Dudley and John Lim have
accepted invitations to the debate, which will be
moderated by U.S. Rep. Greg Walden, the only GOP
member of Oregon’s congressional delegation. Bill
Sizemore, the party’s 1998 nominee and a candidate
this time, is not listed as a participant.

A straw poll will be conducted March 7.

Walden and former U.S. Sen. Gordon Smith, who lost
his re-election bid in 2008, will speak Saturday.

Delegates will debate five topics: A state requirement
for locator beacons, restructuring of Oregon
universities to make some of them public
corporations, U.S. military withdrawal from
Afghanistan, the federal budget and the national
debt, and restructuring of the state tax system.

Categories : Oregon Businesses
Comments (0)

Forbes: Bluest States Spilling The Most Red Ink

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

Forbes.com

Personal Finance
Political Litmus Test: Bluest States Spilling The Most Red Ink
Neil Weinberg, 02.25.10, 10:30 AM ET

Want to know which states are in the worst financial condition? One telling indicator that might not immediately come to mind is whether most of its citizens identify themselves as Democrats.

The five states in the worst financial condition–Illinois, New York, Connecticut, California and New Jersey–are all among the bluest of blue states. The five most fiscally fit states are more of a mix. Three–Utah, Nebraska and Texas–boast Republican majorities and two–New Hampshire and Virginia–skew Democratic.

The financial ranking of the states is part of a recent Forbes report on the Global Debt Bomb. The political affiliation data was compiled in a 2009 poll of 350,000 adults by Gallup Daily.

Forbes’ metrics for each state included unfunded pension liabilities, changes in tax revenue, credit ratings, debt as a percentage of Gross State Product, debt per capita, growth expectations for employment and the state economy, net migrations and a “moocher ratio” that compares government employees, pension burdens and Medicaid enrollees to private-sector employment.

In Pictures: Bluest States Spilling The Most Red Ink

Why do Democratic states appear to be struggling more than Republican ones? It comes down to stronger unions and a larger appetite for public programs, according to Kent Redfield, professor emeritus of political studies and public affairs at the University of Illinois’ Center for State Policy and Leadership.

Do you think state finances are better in Democratic or Republican hands? Share your thoughts in the Reader Comments section.

“Unions in general have more influence in Democratic-controlled states,” he says. “This isn’t to say that unions are bad, but where they’re strong you have bigger demands for social services and coalitions with construction companies, road builders and others that push up debt.”

Of the 10 states in the worst financial condition, eight are among a total of 23 defined by Gallup as “solidly Democratic,” meaning the Democrats enjoy an advantage of 10 percentage points or greater in party affiliation. These states include the ones listed above as making up the bottom five, plus Massachusetts, Ohio and Wisconsin.

Of the three other basement-dwellers, Kentucky is defined as “leaning Democratic” (a five- to 10-percentage-point Democratic advantage) and the remaining two–Louisiana and Mississippi–are termed politically “Competitive” (less than a five-percentage-point advantage for either party). Louisiana tilts slightly Democratic and Mississippi slightly Republican.


The majority Republican states ranked among the financially healthiest are Utah, Nebraska, Texas, North Dakota and Montana. All told, seven of the 10 most Republican states rank in the top half in terms of fiscal fitness. The exceptions are Kansas at No. 28, Alaska (31) and Mississippi (44). It should be noted that four of these red-leaning states are categorized as “competitive” by Gallup. In total only three of the 50 states (Idaho, Utah and Wyoming) are rated “solidly Republican”; only Alabama ranks as “Republican leaning.”

Utah, the fiscally fittest state, has debt of just $442 and unfunded pension obligations of $7,272 per resident. It is also America’s second reddest state with a 21-percentage-point Republican advantage in party affiliation. The Beehive state boasts a triple-A credit rating from Moody’s.

Illinois is in the worst financial condition, with per-capita debt of $1,877 and unfunded pensions of $17,230. Moody’s rates Illinois’ general obligation debt A1, ahead of only California’s.

In Pictures: Bluest States Spilling The Most Red Ink

Categories : Oregon Businesses
Comments (0)

Renee Kimball visited us at last week’s meeting and shared the importance of having a full slate of PCP’s (Precinct Committee Persons).

What is a PCP?

The smallest geographical area of elected representation is the precinct.  It usually contains up to about 5,000 registered voters.  The PCP, or Precinct Committeeperson, is the representative of registered voters in that precinct.  Precincts are ”neighborhoods” and, depending on density, can range from a few dozen blocks to a few square miles.  In counties such as Harney, however, they can be as large as several hundred square miles. For every 500 registered voters in a precinct (regardless of party affiliation) party members can choose 1 male AND 1 female ”Precinct Committeeperson”.  The PCPs can be chosen either in the primary election of even numbered years or appointed throughout their two year tenure by the other PCPs in the party.  Both major parties have the same number of PCPs which are selected by county.

Why Are they Important?

While I appreciate and support third parties, the reality of Oregon is that political press and organizations only give platforms to the two major parties.  Therefore, the two opportunities to have any substantial ”voice” in the political debate are the Democrats or the Republicans.  The party leadership and focus are determined by the PCPs.  They vote on everything that comes before the party from the county through the national levels.  This includes platforms, officers and delegates to the state party, congressional district and national parties.  The PCPs also determine the “State Electors” for the party who actually vote on the presidential candidates.  From the precinct up to the national party, they determine who runs the show and what are the governing policies.  If you want a party’s focus to be firmly planted on small g (government) and small t (tax), it all begins in the bedrock of electing and appointing PCPs who hold these values and priorities.

If you want your personal values and principles to be the foundation of the political power centers of governance, you have to elect individuals who hold those values and principles.  The entire structure of the political power centers is based on who is or is not a PCP.  No matter how many wealthy and influential individuals there may be at the top of the pyramid of power apparently determining the direction of the party, it ultimately CAN be defined by a foundation of PCPs.  For far too long, we have been trying to rule from the top down without success.  Changing the capstone on the pyramid makes no difference.  However, if a principled and unified foundation moves in a particular direction, the capstone has no choice but to follow.  If, however, the foundation abdicates it’s responsibility and power, the entire structure can be co-opted and commanded by a very few elite, powerful and usually unprincipled willing collaborators.

What are the duties of a PCP?

The barest minimum is attend the County Central Committee meetings (usually from 4 to 6 a year).  From there the answer depends on how much you want things to change and how sincere you are in putting time and energy into the process.  Ideally, the “involved volunteer” job description includes walking or calling your precinct in support of small g, small t candidates and issues, registering voters, attending town halls of and occasional visits to “representatives” to voice your concerns for/praise of their representation, phone banking for issues, candidates, meetings and educational opportunities.  You may be called on to distribute campaign materials, gather signatures or even hold gatherings for candidates.  It really depends on how determined you are personally to increase the net amount of freedom and replace command,  control and regulate hierarchy with constitutionally representative and principled leadership.

How to get involved?

Contact me directly Renee@EnufWaste.com or 503-238-6973 or download the PCP form from http://www.sos.state.or.us/elections/publications/pdf/forms/SEL105.pdf and mail it to MCRP, PO Box 2241, Portland Oregon 97208.  Even if you’re from another county, I will make sure your form is sent to the appropriate individual in your county.  You can also go to the Multnomah County Republican Party website www.MultnomahGOP.org and fill out the volunteer form there.

Our next Central Committee Meeting is April 12th and we’re moving locations so I don’t have one yet however, if you sign up through the website, I’ll make sure you get notified.

Time lines…

You only need 3 votes to be elected a PCP.  If your name is on the ballot, you can pretty much be guaranteed of that.  However if there are more people than places, the positions go to the greatest number of votes.

You must have been registered Republican by September 8th to fill out the form and be on the ballot.  Filing deadline is March 9th

You must have been registered Republican by November 18th to be a write-in candidate on the ballot.  Write-in up to 8pm on election day.

Each county determines how long you must have been registered Republican in order to be an appointed PCP.

Categories : Oregon Businesses
Comments (0)

Pro-Taxpayer Groups to Host Rally for Thousands on Capitol Steps!

Saturday, February 13th, 2010

On Monday February 15th over a thousand Oregonians will gather on the steps of the Capitol with a unified message, “we want less!” The passage of Measures 66 and 67 sent a strong message to business owners and taxpayers that Oregon is closed for businesses.

Oregon families and businesses will gather to ask the Legislature and the Governor to avoid the temptation to raise additional taxes, including stealing the “kicker”. Rather the legislature should focus on reducing the tax and regulatory burden on hard working Oregon families and businesses.

Oregon FreedomWorks Director Russ Walker stated “The Legislatures irresponsible spending binge must come to an end. Oregon families and businesses can no longer afford to pay for the out of control spending of politicians and the special interest groups that feed at the taxpayer trough.” He suggested that the legislature should do what’s best for all of Oregon and not just the big government special interest.

He urged the Legislature to put a side partisan fighting and do what is best for Oregon families and businesses. Walker added “The Legislature must put a priority on making Oregon’s business environment competitive again. That is best done by reducing the tax and regulatory burden.”

The rally is located on the North End of the Capitol on the front steps from 11am to 2pm on Monday, February 15th.

After the rally, the sponsoring coalition is organizing lobby visits for attendees with members of the legislature.

Sponsoring Organizations include: FreedomWorks, Taxpayer Defense Project, the Salem 9-12 Project, Oregon Patriots/Resistnet, Common Sense for Oregon, Tea Party Patriots, Marion County Republicans and Capitol City Republican Women

Potential Speakers Include:
Members of the coalition will speak
Talk Show Host Bill Post, KYKN 1430 AM
Talk Show Host Victoria Taft, KPAM 860 AM
Republican House Leader, Representatives Bruce Hanna
Republican Senate Leader, Senator Ted Ferrioli
Representative Matt Wingard
Representative Dennis Richardson
Senator Jason Atkinson
Nick Olsen, Owner Olsen Homes and Renovation
Kristina Ribali, Small Business Owner
Larry Sykes, Small Business Owner
Gordon Kelly, Small Business Owner

Time: February 15, 2010 from 11am to 2pm
Location: State Capitol, Salem, Oregon
Street: 900 Court Street, Northeast
City/Town: Salem, OR

Comments (0)

“Those with the Gold RULE”…And The Public Unions have the Gold.

Saturday, February 6th, 2010

 

The below article by Larry Huss is very well written and paints a very clear picture of why Oregon politics is out of control.

The ink was not even dry on the results of the election when Gov. Kulongoski called in leaders from the public employee unions and the business community seeking support for his proposal to raise even more revenue by eliminating Oregon’s cherished “kicker” – the amount by which taxes are collected in excess of budgeted need each year. The public employee unions’ leaders endorsed the proposal enthusiastically – why wouldn’t they since they are the primary beneficiaries of increased government spending? The business community, still licking its wounds from the passage of the massive tax increases in Measures 66 and 67, were more reticent – and for good reason. They have seen the future and it is one of unchecked spending and continuous increases in fees and taxes and all backed by the public employee unions massive campaign war chests.

Oregon’s political system is broken. It lacks any semblance of a balance because one entity – the public employee unions – has access to virtually unlimited amounts of cash that it has demonstrated it is prepared to spend freely. No person or entity, or even a group of entities, can match the financial resources of the public employee unions – particularly on a recurring basis.

The recent election on Measure 66 and 67 highlighted the disparity. The proponents of the massive tax increase outspent the opponents by over fifty percent. The vast majority of the proponents’ money came from the public employee unions and therein lies the rub.

When the opponents needed money to finance the signature gathering and campaign they had to go out to contributors one by one and raise the money – a $100 here, a $1000 there. Yes, there were some large contributions from some large business entities but they pale in comparison to the million dollar contributions from the public employee unions.

And while the opponents had to go one by one to their contributors, the public employee unions had the state and local government and the local school districts automatically collect and remit their money on a quarterly basis – over $60 million of it each biennium – every biennium. While the opponents had to beg and convince each contributor each time they asked for a contribution, the public employees unions have a mandatory collection from public employees each payday using the resources of the state and local government and the local school districts.

The sheer volume of money available to the public employees unions coupled with the use of government resources to collect the mandatory contributions is what has unbalanced the political process. Until a means is found to return the public employee unions to the same footing as all other political organizations in terms of raising political money, Oregon political system will remain broken.

Even though the public employees unions tend to support Democrats – almost exclusively – this is not about party politics. This is about political corruption where one entity utilizes the resources of the state to acquire political contributions on a mandatory basis and thereafter uses those contributions to ensure government benefits to itself. The public employee unions have run the state of California over the economic cliff and they have now pushed Oregon to the brink.

No other political fight is worth pursuing until the corruption in Oregon’s political system is purged.

Categories : Oregon Businesses
Comments (1)

Sales Tax Proposal is back – Proceeds would pay for health coverage

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

Sales tax proposal returns to radar

Lawmakers: Proceeds would pay for health coverage for all

By Peter Wong and Tracy Loew
Statesman Journal

A sales tax proposal is back at the Oregon Legislature — but even though it’s unlikely to advance this session, lawmakers say they are intrigued because its proceeds would pay for health coverage for every Oregonian.

John DiLorenzo, a Portland lawyer who lobbies on behalf of business clients, told lawmakers Tuesday that a sales tax earmarked for health care would offer savings for businesses and state government.

Employers would no longer be expected to pay health care premiums for their employees. That would boost Oregon’s economy, drawing hundreds of new employers to the state and increasing employment and income taxes, he said.

Oregon is one of the few states nationwide that could dedicate a sales tax to health care because the state currently has no sales tax, he said.

Sales tax proposals have failed nine times between 1933 and 1993, but DiLorenzo said Oregon voters rejected them because the proceeds would have gone into the state’s general fund for schools and state services.

“The current electorate, given real leadership, might view a constitutionally dedicated sales tax to finance basic health care as preferable to the prospect of the loss of their health care — given how precarious each person’s job happens to be today — and how unsustainable the current system really is,” DiLorenzo told the Senate Health Care Committee.

DiLorenzo said he was speaking only for himself. He said based on certain assumptions on benefits and deductibles, a 7 percent rate would be required, although there would be exemptions on food, housing and utilities.

The current legislative session is scheduled to end Feb. 28, and it took months for lawmakers to write two sales-tax proposals sent to voters in 1985 and 1993.

“The plan is great, but the details have to be looked at very carefully,” said Sen. Alan Bates, D-Ashland, who is a physician.

Chairwoman Laurie Monnes Anderson, D-Gresham, who is a nurse, said she would encourage informal discussions during the interim, with the aim of moving forward with a bill in 2011.

“Businesses, I think, would love this,” she said. “With proper education, I think the public would too. The problem is the word sales tax.”

tloew@StatesmanJournal.com or (503) 399-6779; pwong@StatesmanJournal.com or (503) 399-6745

Categories : Oregon Businesses
Comments (6)

The Morning After The Vote – 66 & 67

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

Well things did not go the way we wanted last night. The majority of Oregon voters decided to increase taxes. I am sure that some companies will decide to close their doors because they cannot afford the additional tax burden. I am truly sorry this has happened to your company. Others may decide to leave the state and start over somewhere else. I wish you great success.

I have decided that I love living in Oregon. I believe the politics of this state can change when our unemployment rises and some corporations decide not to relocate here. But just like what has happened with President Obama’s popularity, the voters can realize they made a mistake attacking employers.

I am encouraged by the rapid growth of this organization and other conservative groups within the state. This election was not a landslide! We were out spent 7 to 1. We can learn from this election and continue to grow by speaking the truth and allowing people to experience the results of this election.

There are other critical elections coming up this year. Let’s all decide to do what we can to point out the facts to our “Progressive” friend. We do not need to attack them or call them idiots. We need to show them that we are committed to improving the quality of life in Oregon. That means more employment with livable wages. One of the problems with government programs is that they are not capable of providing wealth or even secure comfortable living. They keep the recipients about 2” above drowning. We need to show then that government programs are not freedom, but rather chains holding them down and preventing success.

Notice that we are still alive, the sun is shinning, and the rain will soon return to maintain the beauty of our state. Let’s continue to Rebuild Oregon.

Ken Bear Cole

A Second Look Business Consulting LLC.

Comments (4)

The Outlook – Guest Opinion

Group ask voters to reject measures

 Jan 23, 2010

Rebuild Oregon is a newly formed grassroots group of people in East County working toward conservative values of fiscal restraint, limited government and traditional education goals teaching self-sufficiency.

Rebuild Oregon feels measures 66 and 67 are ill-conceived, poorly timed and inequitable. Imposing a sales-tax-type gross receipts tax on companies will raise the costs of all goods in Oregon. Businesses in Oregon pay their fair share in the form of payroll taxes, property taxes and numerous other taxes. It is disingenuous of the supporters of measures 66 and 67 to say corporations do not pay enough. Corporations pay a heavy tax burden to employ residents of Oregon. Raising taxes on corporations will lead to higher costs of all goods and will reduce the work force in Oregon as companies seek to cut costs or relocate. Oregon already has a reputation of being unfriendly to business and many businesses can choose to relocate outside of our borders, taking more jobs out of Oregon.

Raising taxes on company owners is another disincentive to start businesses and employ residents of Oregon. We do not support Measure 66 because discouraging investors through higher income taxes will hurt our economy. Now is not the time to place the burden of poor fiscal management at the state level on successful people who employ Oregonians.

Rebuild Oregon asks the question of anybody seeking to “put it to the rich,” have they ever seen a poor person employ somebody? Many of our members are located in East County and own small businesses. Small business has suffered during the recession and raising taxes on these owners will lead to further staff cuts. Additionally, when less than 3 percent of our citizens pay almost 33 percent of the state’s local revenue, we believe this is more than “fair.”

Many business owners across the state have seen their profits vanish, while their personnel have taken huge pay cuts, yet count themselves lucky to remain employed. Last year, the pay and benefits package for the average state employee actually climbed.

Since the start of the recession, Oregon has lost more than 131,000 private-sector jobs according to the Oregon Employment Department. With unemployment at 11.1 percent and 213,000 Oregonians out of work, leading economists estimate that the new, permanent tax increases will cost an additional 70,000 Oregonians their jobs.

For Oregon to compete for large corporations, who employee hundreds to thousands of workers, we need to have sensible tax laws.

As citizens, we elect our legislators to act on behalf of all citizens, not do the bidding of the unions and special interests.

State newspapers, business groups, Chambers of Commerce and hundreds of thousands of Oregonians have come out against 66 and 67. We, the members of Rebuild Oregon, have a great love for our community and we would hate to see the damage that these measures would do.

Please visit www.rebuildoregon.com for more information on our group.

Jeff Anderson is a Fairview resident.

Categories : Oregon Businesses
Comments (0)

Are Public Employee Unions Buying Election?

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010
Are Public Employee Unions Buying Election?
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
ThinkOregon in Government Spending, Measure 66 & 67

ORP News Release:

In the political arena the old adage “follow the money” is usually sage advice. “In this Special Election, the proponent’s money trail leads exclusively to the public employee unions – the same unions who stand to benefit the most from these tax increases,” Oregon Republican Party Chairman Bob Tiernan said today.

As of January 8th, close to $4 million of advertising has been bought with funds from just four public employee unions – much of which has come from outside Oregon. With these contributions and influx of out-of-state money, the tax proponents have outspent the entire Oregon business community nearly two to one in advertising.

“Vote Yes for Oregon” Contribution History from ORESTAR (through January 8th):
Service Employees International Union………………………………………………. $866,000
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees………….. $1,000,000 
Oregon Education Association the National Education Association…………. $1,657,000 
American Federation of Teachers………………………………………………………. $250,000
Total public employee union contributions………………………………. $3,773,000

“Never have the beneficiaries of a huge government payday been so brazen in their efforts to influence an election,” Chairman Tiernan continued.

The two tax measures are estimated to raise about $733 million in new tax revenue. As much as 80% of the new tax dollars generated by the passage of Measures 66 and 67 will be needed to pay Oregon public employee salary increases and generous health care benefits. Nearly 40% of that amount is needed to pay the increase in salary and benefits for the current and newly hired state public employee union members.

“It’s clear that the proponents of these taxes are willing to go to any length to win this election, including distributing misleading and inaccurate information. However, one thing that is clear is the public employee unions spending millions of dollars trying to buy this election in the hopes of big payday if these taxes pass – at the expense of more Oregon jobs,” Chairman Tiernan concluded.

Comments (1)